<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BT 2700 HGV Router problems in Archive</title>
    <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-2700-HGV-Router-problems/m-p/74518#M1491</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Well after further investigation by&amp;nbsp;both BT and myself, we decided&amp;nbsp;the best course of action was to replace with a non-BT router, so after spending&amp;nbsp;£15 on fleabay, I now have a Cisco 857 in place of the 2700HGV - problem solved, lower latency too!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>10forcash</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-16T12:34:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BT 2700 HGV Router problems</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-2700-HGV-Router-problems/m-p/74431#M1490</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For some time (months, not weeks or days) we have been experiencing high latency,&amp;nbsp; loss of connection, dropped packets and router resets - even on two occasions, reset to factory condition...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Replaced the router (same type)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Replaced the PSU&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Replaced all cables&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Replaced the filter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Had an engineer call, line tested and new faceplate with filter fitted in the absence of any other cause found (REIN test was OK)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When the problems occur, the phone line (no extensions!) is clear, and we have done random 'quiet line tests' with no noise found&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have recently talked to someone in BB Faults, whou was very helpful - well, as much as he could be, it was mentioned that they could see ten reconnects in one day!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For some time, we have been using the 'content screening' function, this 'dials home' to check the web page address before allowing or denying access, there have been a few instances logged where the router has lost contact with the server - it's not known if that is the cause or effect though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have also experienced the router completely 'freezing' the LAN activity LED is active, no BB activity and no access to the router web pages from the LAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One big concern I have from the router logs is the apparent attempt to contact IP addresses without any requests from the LAN (we're running Wireshark on a switch configured to reflect all traffic on the LAN to that machine and the wireless / BT Openzone is disabled).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's the latest sample from the system log&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To save anyone the effort, the IP's are:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mondrian Holdings, LLC - Los Angeles - a hotel chain&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KDDI CORPORATION - Japan ISP as far as I can see&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SETITAGILA-NET - Russian ISP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm hoping this isn't due to a *NIX vulnerability in the router (have these been patched for the bash script problem?) current reported versions are:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hardware Version: 2701-100589-005&lt;BR /&gt;Firmware Version:&lt;BR /&gt;6.3.9.63-plus.tm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 46.165.4.194[500]&lt;BR /&gt;sntpc: Server ntp3.2wire.com did not respond&lt;BR /&gt;ip: bad window size in constructed ack: -2885, session 43616&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860823) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860824) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860825) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860826) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860827) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860828) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860829) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860830) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860831) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860832) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860833) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;csd: packet (4022860834) reached maximum retries - aborting packet&lt;BR /&gt;krtlock: thread gen (tid 5) slow rd held 'thread'@0x41a1f2c0 for 16.13s&lt;BR /&gt;krtlock: slck: gen (tid 5):&lt;BR /&gt;krtlock: [5/KERN] - 0: 0x407df2d4&lt;BR /&gt;krtlock: [5/KERN] - 1: 0x4002740c&lt;BR /&gt;krtlock: [5/KERN] - 2: 0x400294c1&lt;BR /&gt;krtlock: [5/KERN] - 3: 0x4012599e&lt;BR /&gt;krtlock: [5/KERN] - 4: 0x400296d8&lt;BR /&gt;krtlock: [5/KERN] - 5: 0x4025d2a2&lt;BR /&gt;krtlock: [5/KERN] - 6: 0x40156a98&lt;BR /&gt;ip: bad window size in constructed ack: -39342, session 80910&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 119.106.86.48[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500]&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:545:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): Invalid exchange type 243 from 38.106.49.206[500].&lt;BR /&gt;iked: [PROTO_ERR]: ikev1.c:1031:&amp;lt;unknown&amp;gt;(): couldn't find configuration for remote 38.106.49.206[500] (local 217.43.97.56[500])&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any clues, pointers or ideas are most welcome!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:18:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-2700-HGV-Router-problems/m-p/74431#M1490</guid>
      <dc:creator>10forcash</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-28T19:18:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BT 2700 HGV Router problems</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-2700-HGV-Router-problems/m-p/74518#M1491</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well after further investigation by&amp;nbsp;both BT and myself, we decided&amp;nbsp;the best course of action was to replace with a non-BT router, so after spending&amp;nbsp;£15 on fleabay, I now have a Cisco 857 in place of the 2700HGV - problem solved, lower latency too!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-2700-HGV-Router-problems/m-p/74518#M1491</guid>
      <dc:creator>10forcash</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-16T12:34:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

