<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia in Archive</title>
    <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6705#M17537</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;its the way that BTs server DONT work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it seems to happen alot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i found rebooting the router fixes it alot of the time. something to do with the server not liking the ip address i suspect&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-25T23:05:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6700#M17536</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two btconnect accounts configured in Mac Entourage that work properly nearly all the time (sending and receiving). Occasionally, one or both of them can't send mail (due to server "authentication" errors) - sometime refusing passwords. Nothing has been changed on the client.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To "fix" the problem, I have either had to enable SMTP authentication or disable it (i.e. the reverse of what worked before).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, I know how to workaround the issue, but why is it happening in the first place. Is BT changing the SMTP policy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tm&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:04:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6700#M17536</guid>
      <dc:creator>tjcmorgan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-25T17:04:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6705#M17537</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;its the way that BTs server DONT work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it seems to happen alot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i found rebooting the router fixes it alot of the time. something to do with the server not liking the ip address i suspect&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6705#M17537</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-25T23:05:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6951#M17538</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"...something to do with the server not liking the ip address i suspect"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Close, but not quite. The issue is that mail.btconnect.com is a CNAME for a farm of servers. Most of them advertise that they require SMTP authentication, but some do not. When the client attempts to send mail, if mail.btconnect.com is resolved to one of the correctly configured servers, authentication will work a treat. However, if it resolves to one of the other ones it will not - but only with some clients (Mac Mail and Outlook 2007 being the most common).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, if your PC/Mac/router is caching DNS answers (as it should), you will continue to hit the same server until the expiration of the DNS result (a quick check gives me a 600 second TTL). Rebooting the router will 'fix' the problem as (a) it will eat up a significant portion of the 600 seconds; and (b) it will likely result in a new lookup that might hit a different server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6951#M17538</guid>
      <dc:creator>adrianc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-04T21:14:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6955#M17539</link>
      <description>why do BT have differently configured servers? surely if they knew this was what caused so many people to complain about BTs email service then they would configure them to be the same?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:22:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6955#M17539</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-05T10:22:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6957#M17540</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is a question I've been searching for an answer to for a long time. The closest I have gotten to a sensible answer is that is is the result of a migration project that never got completed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To be fair though, it only causes a problem with clients that treat the AUTH response as gospel, most will try it anyway and will be able to send.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:46:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6957#M17540</guid>
      <dc:creator>adrianc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-05T11:46:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6968#M17541</link>
      <description>hallelujah!</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/6968#M17541</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-05T21:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7368#M17542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wondered this myself ages ago anyway short answer - they turned on authentication for some servers because they wanted to see how many customers already had SMTP authentication turned on... and of course its not configured correctly or set to fallback gracefully.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The server pool list is online, I tested them ages ago to see which server supported what but I can't find the text file.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7368#M17542</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kirok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-23T12:03:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7372#M17543</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;welcome back kirok.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;apparently... and this is because i was assisting a family friend that i know this...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTinternet now only allows email to be sent when authentication is on and their site &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.btyahoo.com/smtp"&gt;www.btyahoo.com/smtp&lt;/A&gt; (i think its that one) said that in order to combat spam all ISPs will be making everyone turn authentication on. which is fair enough.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;wonder when BTconnect are going to start that. and if so i imagine they will then make all their servers require authentication meaning that the servers will be configured the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:29:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7372#M17543</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-23T12:29:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7382#M17544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Cheers, I occasionally pop in and out, or lurk depending on what else I'm doing or how bored I am and if someone else has answered the question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know BT Internet run things a bit differently I've even seen them blacklist each other on occasion, further to the SMTP survey explanation my guess is they were seeing if they could move wholey over to SMTP auth without customers complaining, probably because they were being killed by spam.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:27:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7382#M17544</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kirok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-23T17:27:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7385#M17545</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;but.... they CAUSED complaints with non comformity between servers.... how can they judge the effects properly if it caused other issues. o well..&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:07:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7385#M17545</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-24T08:07:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7790#M17546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you are connected with BT Broadband and you have authentication enabled chances are it will error.&amp;nbsp; Expecially with outlook, outlook express works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are connecting to another ISP and you try and send mail without authentication you tend to get the same errors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a pain for people who take their laptops home, they have to remove the authentication settings when they connect to the BT line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems to be some sort of problem between the mail servers and certain mail clients.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7790#M17546</guid>
      <dc:creator>spank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T13:41:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7795#M17547</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the point is that you shouldnt have to change the authentication setting on or off regardless. BT cant expect its pc illiterate users to chop and change their settings just because BT cant configure their servers correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:53:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7795#M17547</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T13:53:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7800#M17548</link>
      <description>Indeed, another case of a*** from elbow syndrome.&lt;DIV class="message-edit-history"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="edit-author"&gt;Message Edited by Andy75 on &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="local-date"&gt; 12-08-2009&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="local-time"&gt; 03:47 PM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:47:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7800#M17548</guid>
      <dc:creator>spank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T14:47:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7886#M17549</link>
      <description>Given that this only (ttbomk) affects people using Outlook 2007 and Mac Mail, I don't think that &lt;STRONG&gt;all&lt;/STRONG&gt; the blame can be laid at BT's feet.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7886#M17549</guid>
      <dc:creator>adrianc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-16T15:08:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7888#M17550</link>
      <description>BT provides outlook 2007 as the mail client for organise and share so BT should be able to provide a service that allows a product that they themselves hand out to work. surely?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:42:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7888#M17550</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-16T16:42:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7911#M17551</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You may have hit on something there &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Organise and Organise and Share customer don't have this problem....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7911#M17551</guid>
      <dc:creator>spank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-17T13:57:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7912#M17552</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;spank,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thats because org + share uses exchange not a pop3 account. its pop3 accounts that are doing it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i think&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:17:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7912#M17552</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-17T14:17:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7936#M17553</link>
      <description>Yeah I mean the reason they're not fixing it, to make users buy advanced email hosting instead.&amp;nbsp; Probably not but you never know.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7936#M17553</guid>
      <dc:creator>spank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T09:42:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7942#M17554</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the answer is probably the most obvious. Butthole VS Elbow&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;other ISPs don't have these issues as far as i'm aware&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:50:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7942#M17554</guid>
      <dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T10:50:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMTP Authentication schizophrenia</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7944#M17555</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I seem to be having the same problem. I receive emails ok, but when I go to send emails, it tries to authenticate and keeps asking me for my password, despite me providing it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Email was working fine until yesterday but I haven't changed a thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How I can best get round this ?Just reboot the router or try something else ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paula&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:39:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/SMTP-Authentication-schizophrenia/m-p/7944#M17555</guid>
      <dc:creator>kittyandpolly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T11:39:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

