<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Versatility: lock phones on weekends but with allow for authorised users in Archive</title>
    <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Re-Versatility-lock-phones-on-weekends-but-with-allow-for/m-p/8718#M205</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Apologies, my problem was that there were settings in the Class tables that were left over from my previous experiments and I forgot to clear them.&amp;nbsp; It seems to work now for my test for numbers beginning with 0.&amp;nbsp; Many thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I understand this correctly, the only thing to keep in mind is to AVOID starting the LCR code with a number that is barred in table 6.&amp;nbsp; That is, if I bar calls to outside numbers beginning with 5, then I also cannot use an LCR code beginning with the number 5 for this scheme to work, e.g. '543'.&amp;nbsp; Is that right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also presume that this method will not bar 999 and 112 calls.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Much appreciated for the discussion and patient explanation!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-terry&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lhphone</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-15T17:16:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Versatility: lock phones on weekends but with allow for authorised users</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Re-Versatility-lock-phones-on-weekends-but-with-allow-for/m-p/8718#M205</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Apologies, my problem was that there were settings in the Class tables that were left over from my previous experiments and I forgot to clear them.&amp;nbsp; It seems to work now for my test for numbers beginning with 0.&amp;nbsp; Many thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I understand this correctly, the only thing to keep in mind is to AVOID starting the LCR code with a number that is barred in table 6.&amp;nbsp; That is, if I bar calls to outside numbers beginning with 5, then I also cannot use an LCR code beginning with the number 5 for this scheme to work, e.g. '543'.&amp;nbsp; Is that right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also presume that this method will not bar 999 and 112 calls.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Much appreciated for the discussion and patient explanation!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-terry&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Re-Versatility-lock-phones-on-weekends-but-with-allow-for/m-p/8718#M205</guid>
      <dc:creator>lhphone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-15T17:16:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

