<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Video conferencing on BTNet or 21cn (MPLS) in Archive</title>
    <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Video-conferencing-on-BTNet-or-21cn-MPLS/m-p/29421#M2296</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Youve got an interesting one there. We have a similar circuit going in for voice, video between 2 sites and gen traffic, except one of our sites has a 4 on 10M line and the other a 10 on 100M.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have used our 10M bearer for VC to Australia, Europe and USA with no issues, prob via gatekeepers though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LanMan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-18T10:38:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Video conferencing on BTNet or 21cn (MPLS)</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Video-conferencing-on-BTNet-or-21cn-MPLS/m-p/16923#M2295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon, first post on forums so aplogies if this has been covered elsewhere already (any pointers would be appreciated!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a difference of opinion within my business over whether to install a BTNet 100M circuit (on a 100M bearer) or whether to install (via a thrid party) a 100M MPLS circuit (on a 100M bearer).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The line will be used to convey voice and video calls as well as standard external network traffic (browsing / emails etc.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding is that the BTNet solution (clarified by the nice BT salesman as NOT MPLS) is limited as far as providing QOS whereas the MPLS line would do this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any definative answers?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:32:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Video-conferencing-on-BTNet-or-21cn-MPLS/m-p/16923#M2295</guid>
      <dc:creator>BY1970</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-30T12:32:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Video conferencing on BTNet or 21cn (MPLS)</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Video-conferencing-on-BTNet-or-21cn-MPLS/m-p/29421#M2296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Youve got an interesting one there. We have a similar circuit going in for voice, video between 2 sites and gen traffic, except one of our sites has a 4 on 10M line and the other a 10 on 100M.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have used our 10M bearer for VC to Australia, Europe and USA with no issues, prob via gatekeepers though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Video-conferencing-on-BTNet-or-21cn-MPLS/m-p/29421#M2296</guid>
      <dc:creator>LanMan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-18T10:38:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

