<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic BT admits snooping on customer LANs in Archive</title>
    <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-admits-snooping-on-customer-LANs/m-p/26149#M3959</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;BT reserves, and makes use of, the right to remotely detect all devices connected to LANs owned by its broadband customers – for their own good, of course.﻿ &lt;EM&gt;full story is here &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/24/bt_snooping/"&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/24/bt_snooping/&lt;/A&gt;﻿&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"we don't believe that consent is necessary where the testing is necessary to the service that we are providing" &lt;/STRONG&gt;bleated a sacrificial PR person&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 10:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sogo7</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-25T10:14:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BT admits snooping on customer LANs</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-admits-snooping-on-customer-LANs/m-p/26149#M3959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;BT reserves, and makes use of, the right to remotely detect all devices connected to LANs owned by its broadband customers – for their own good, of course.﻿ &lt;EM&gt;full story is here &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/24/bt_snooping/"&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/24/bt_snooping/&lt;/A&gt;﻿&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"we don't believe that consent is necessary where the testing is necessary to the service that we are providing" &lt;/STRONG&gt;bleated a sacrificial PR person&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 10:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-admits-snooping-on-customer-LANs/m-p/26149#M3959</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sogo7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-25T10:14:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BT admits snooping on customer LANs</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-admits-snooping-on-customer-LANs/m-p/26161#M3960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In this case, BT had supplied replacement devices to the customer on condition that the originals were returned to BT or destroyed and no longer used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BT has a duty of care to ensure that equipment supplied by BT is safe to use and in the case of those devices there is a potentially lethal fault.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So,&amp;nbsp; BT has identified those customers continuing to use the devices - and directly warned them about the hazards for a second time and if a fault now occurs and the person is injured, they will have little comeback against BT.&amp;nbsp; Secondly, some of those users are in possession of BTs property that should have been returned - they are dishonestly retaining it and could be classed as theft.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BT has, in my opinion, done the right thing in directing the communications to people who have ignored warnings.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 11:28:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/BT-admits-snooping-on-customer-LANs/m-p/26161#M3960</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-25T11:28:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

