<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Business Hub, Static IPs and Dedicated Firewalls in Archive</title>
    <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Business-Hub-Static-IPs-and-Dedicated-Firewalls/m-p/29429#M4383</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just a quick query to survey opinions on using the BT Hubs in front of dedicated firewalls with static IP addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I always seem to run into endless fun and games with this style of setup, and was curious to see what other people's experiences were like?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, we might have this scenario:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Internal Network &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; Firewall &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; BT Hub &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; Phone socket/microfilter/etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What we usually find is that due to the way the Hub identifies individual 'devices' on its internal interface, it doesn't play nicely with having a selection of static 1-to-1 NATs set up on the proper firewall, and only seems to play nicely with a single IP address tied to a single device/MAC address on its internal interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My gut instinct is generally to just throw the Hub out and use a proper ADSL router, but what experiences do other folk have in this situation? Has anyone made this kind of setup work correctly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:40:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bob_4563</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-18T13:40:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Business Hub, Static IPs and Dedicated Firewalls</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Business-Hub-Static-IPs-and-Dedicated-Firewalls/m-p/29429#M4383</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just a quick query to survey opinions on using the BT Hubs in front of dedicated firewalls with static IP addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I always seem to run into endless fun and games with this style of setup, and was curious to see what other people's experiences were like?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, we might have this scenario:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Internal Network &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; Firewall &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; BT Hub &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; Phone socket/microfilter/etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What we usually find is that due to the way the Hub identifies individual 'devices' on its internal interface, it doesn't play nicely with having a selection of static 1-to-1 NATs set up on the proper firewall, and only seems to play nicely with a single IP address tied to a single device/MAC address on its internal interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My gut instinct is generally to just throw the Hub out and use a proper ADSL router, but what experiences do other folk have in this situation? Has anyone made this kind of setup work correctly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:40:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Business-Hub-Static-IPs-and-Dedicated-Firewalls/m-p/29429#M4383</guid>
      <dc:creator>bob_4563</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-18T13:40:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Business Hub, Static IPs and Dedicated Firewalls</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Business-Hub-Static-IPs-and-Dedicated-Firewalls/m-p/29443#M4384</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi bob, please forgive my ignorance here, but is there any reason that the WAN port of your firewall must have a local IP with a static mapped to it via 1-to-1 IP mapping and can't have the IP directly assigned? Generally I would've thought the a static directly on the WAN wouldn't really make much of a difference. Again please excuse my ignorance, obviously a network and it's needs are unique to the user.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only real issues i've seen where the hub is totally unusable is when you want to map all 5/13 public IP's to the WAN port, where indeed the routers issue of only allowing 1 IP to 1 MAC makes it impossible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Business-Hub-Static-IPs-and-Dedicated-Firewalls/m-p/29443#M4384</guid>
      <dc:creator>a-hill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-19T07:53:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

