<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Links, links, links... in Archive</title>
    <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Links-links-links/m-p/6920#M9790</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've had a some basic html pages up for some time on a BT Connect package. Although I have web publisher and Internet Business pack, I am awkward in that I don't want BT to manage my domain, and as the site is simple enough to not warrant CMS features, and I'm happy&amp;nbsp; just to edit the code for now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The linking is dead straightforward - just half a dozen pages all in the same directory. My registrant domain service just forwards traffic to my BT Connect index page. This has worked fine for years, I had just direct links to the pages as they were all&amp;nbsp; in the same directory. Just recently, I noticed that under Firefox browsers, the "home.btconnect.com/myuserid/" path is displayed (but not IE 8 for some reason). To get around this I changed my links to be full path including my domain. This seemed to work ok for a while, but now whenever any of my full path links are selected eg: "http://www.mydomain.com/firstpage.html" , a BT page that to any casual user seems to be claiming ownship over my domain is displayed instead of the correct site page (this applies to both IE and Firefox).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What gives? A cynic might feel that the "standard" hosting service has been downgraded to "Lite" to force users onto a more expensive package which you would have expected to get but don't with either the Web Publisher or Internet Business Pack.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Probably easier to manage for BT but a pain for me - if true. Enlightenment anyone?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dynasp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-03T13:59:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Links, links, links...</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Links-links-links/m-p/6920#M9790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've had a some basic html pages up for some time on a BT Connect package. Although I have web publisher and Internet Business pack, I am awkward in that I don't want BT to manage my domain, and as the site is simple enough to not warrant CMS features, and I'm happy&amp;nbsp; just to edit the code for now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The linking is dead straightforward - just half a dozen pages all in the same directory. My registrant domain service just forwards traffic to my BT Connect index page. This has worked fine for years, I had just direct links to the pages as they were all&amp;nbsp; in the same directory. Just recently, I noticed that under Firefox browsers, the "home.btconnect.com/myuserid/" path is displayed (but not IE 8 for some reason). To get around this I changed my links to be full path including my domain. This seemed to work ok for a while, but now whenever any of my full path links are selected eg: "http://www.mydomain.com/firstpage.html" , a BT page that to any casual user seems to be claiming ownship over my domain is displayed instead of the correct site page (this applies to both IE and Firefox).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What gives? A cynic might feel that the "standard" hosting service has been downgraded to "Lite" to force users onto a more expensive package which you would have expected to get but don't with either the Web Publisher or Internet Business Pack.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Probably easier to manage for BT but a pain for me - if true. Enlightenment anyone?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Links-links-links/m-p/6920#M9790</guid>
      <dc:creator>dynasp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-03T13:59:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Links, links, links...</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Links-links-links/m-p/6922#M9791</link>
      <description>If your pages are showing home.btconnect.com then the &lt;STRONG&gt;IS&lt;/STRONG&gt; the web hosting lite that you are using.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:19:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Links-links-links/m-p/6922#M9791</guid>
      <dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-03T14:19:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Links, links, links...</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Links-links-links/m-p/6977#M9792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to clarify - you've got a non-BT hosted domain that is pointed to home.btconnect.com/&amp;lt;webspace&amp;gt; and the issue is that some browers display "http://yourdomain/yourpage" in the status bar and some display http://home.btconnect.com/&amp;lt;webspace&amp;gt;/yourpage - is that summarising it correctly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so, the issue lies with how you are forwarding the domain name and how the browsers are handling that redirect. To emphaise what dave wrote earlier - home.btconnect.com is the server for the Lite (free) web hosting package.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Archive/Links-links-links/m-p/6977#M9792</guid>
      <dc:creator>adrianc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-06T10:35:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

