<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Business Smart Hub 2 Port forwarding problem in Broadband</title>
    <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Broadband/Business-Smart-Hub-2-Port-forwarding-problem/m-p/91253#M17289</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've accepted that there probably isn't a "solution" to this but are the Firmware developers even aware that it is an issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running a 3CX server behind a Smart hub 2 currently requires a DMZ configuration. Strictly speaking to pass the server's tests you'll also need to turn the firewall off but after getting a good test result it can be turned back on again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A port forwarding configuration &lt;U&gt;almost&lt;/U&gt; works except that ports are being remapped, they are not properly transparent. Specifically I believe outbound connections are being handled by NAPT (NAT)&amp;nbsp; not by the forwarding rules. The difference is subtle but apparently matters for SIP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reasons for wanting to use forwarding rules and not DMZ:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't want to expose other vulnerabilities that might exist on the server such as the RDP port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There can only be one DMZ device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It just seems an extreme solution.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 09:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>obroad</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-05T09:19:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Business Smart Hub 2 Port forwarding problem</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Broadband/Business-Smart-Hub-2-Port-forwarding-problem/m-p/91253#M17289</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've accepted that there probably isn't a "solution" to this but are the Firmware developers even aware that it is an issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running a 3CX server behind a Smart hub 2 currently requires a DMZ configuration. Strictly speaking to pass the server's tests you'll also need to turn the firewall off but after getting a good test result it can be turned back on again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A port forwarding configuration &lt;U&gt;almost&lt;/U&gt; works except that ports are being remapped, they are not properly transparent. Specifically I believe outbound connections are being handled by NAPT (NAT)&amp;nbsp; not by the forwarding rules. The difference is subtle but apparently matters for SIP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reasons for wanting to use forwarding rules and not DMZ:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't want to expose other vulnerabilities that might exist on the server such as the RDP port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There can only be one DMZ device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It just seems an extreme solution.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 09:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/Broadband/Business-Smart-Hub-2-Port-forwarding-problem/m-p/91253#M17289</guid>
      <dc:creator>obroad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-05T09:19:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

