<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is BT a dying company? in The Lounge</title>
    <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/The-Lounge/Is-BT-a-dying-company/m-p/89914#M6776</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I work for a mid sized government organization that has the WAN, LAN and IPT under a fully managed service with BT. After dealing with BT now for a few years in the contract I question how they still exist as a company. Are BT a dying company who just rely on long contracts that non technical CIO's sign and the monopoly of ducts and last mile cabling?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In previous roles working in a service provider and another managed service I think MSP's that come from the service provider space are not in the right space to manage enterprise networking. I don't really see how they innovate vs smaller MSP's that dont come from MPLS service provider market. Policies seem to be based around a service provider model where changes to core product are not very frequent (Applying this to the enterprise doesnt appear to be flexible enough).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There appears to be huge amounts of non-technical staff at BT rather than decent technical engineers. I find that one technical guy is overrun with fixing everything on our contract.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do BT need to do to stay relevant and become sucessful? If BT lose openreach are they going to die?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 10:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>carter5</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-03T10:31:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is BT a dying company?</title>
      <link>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/The-Lounge/Is-BT-a-dying-company/m-p/89914#M6776</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I work for a mid sized government organization that has the WAN, LAN and IPT under a fully managed service with BT. After dealing with BT now for a few years in the contract I question how they still exist as a company. Are BT a dying company who just rely on long contracts that non technical CIO's sign and the monopoly of ducts and last mile cabling?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In previous roles working in a service provider and another managed service I think MSP's that come from the service provider space are not in the right space to manage enterprise networking. I don't really see how they innovate vs smaller MSP's that dont come from MPLS service provider market. Policies seem to be based around a service provider model where changes to core product are not very frequent (Applying this to the enterprise doesnt appear to be flexible enough).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There appears to be huge amounts of non-technical staff at BT rather than decent technical engineers. I find that one technical guy is overrun with fixing everything on our contract.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do BT need to do to stay relevant and become sucessful? If BT lose openreach are they going to die?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 10:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://business.forums.bt.com/t5/The-Lounge/Is-BT-a-dying-company/m-p/89914#M6776</guid>
      <dc:creator>carter5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-03T10:31:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

